<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JavaScript HTML Templating: EJS vs jQuery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://carlfurrow.com/2010/01/javascript-html-templating-ejs-vs-jquery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://carlfurrow.com/2010/01/javascript-html-templating-ejs-vs-jquery/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 12:45:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://carlfurrow.com/2010/01/javascript-html-templating-ejs-vs-jquery/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 02:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlfurrow.com/?p=102#comment-27</guid>
		<description>I have not tried it on anything but modern browsers, but I wouldn&#039;t anticipate it being a burden for the client to render the HTML.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not tried it on anything but modern browsers, but I wouldn&#8217;t anticipate it being a burden for the client to render the HTML.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew McEachen</title>
		<link>http://carlfurrow.com/2010/01/javascript-html-templating-ejs-vs-jquery/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew McEachen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 02:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlfurrow.com/?p=102#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Thanks for writing this quick tutorial!

Have you tried non-trivial EJS scripts on slower javascript implementations? It seems like the performance of your webapp will then vary based on the user&#039;s machine (rather than your server).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for writing this quick tutorial!</p>
<p>Have you tried non-trivial EJS scripts on slower javascript implementations? It seems like the performance of your webapp will then vary based on the user&#8217;s machine (rather than your server).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Javascript HTML Templating: EJS vs JAML</title>
		<link>http://carlfurrow.com/2010/01/javascript-html-templating-ejs-vs-jquery/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Javascript HTML Templating: EJS vs JAML</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlfurrow.com/?p=102#comment-15</guid>
		<description>[...] let&#8217;s do the same comparison I did for jQuery vs EJS. First we start off with a products [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] let&#8217;s do the same comparison I did for jQuery vs EJS. First we start off with a products [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
